Currently Reading

Books I'm working through. Honest takes — if it's good I'll say so, if it's not I'll say that too.

So far I feel as if the book immediately sets an assumption regarding cognition and consiousness, continously reiterating over points that are not refutable and drawing premature conclusions. The book so far is, "If, your subconcious is already aware of the decision you will make ahead of time or if external factors of any kind past and present influence the decision or thought then free will cannot exist in a compatibalist or liberal manner."

Finished

Move books here when done. Keep your notes.

← back home